How are great journalists made? Often, it’s pieces of great journalism that help form them, influencing their lives or careers in an indelible way. To celebrate the Nieman Foundation for Journalism’s 80th anniversary in 2018, we asked Nieman Fellows to share works of journalism that in some way left a significant mark on them, their work or their beat, their country, or their culture. The result is what Nieman curator Ann Marie Lipinski calls “an accidental curriculum that has shaped generations of journalists.”
More Nieman Fellows on exemplary journalism that influenced them[/sidebar]
You don’t find books; books find you. That’s what essayist Joseph Epstein told us in our writing classes at Northwestern. All these years later, I still think he’s right. Barbara W. Tuchman’s “Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911-1945” found me in the late 1980s; it was the book that inspired me to sell nearly everything I owned and go to China, just to see it for myself. I became a China correspondent and it would be years before I would set foot in the United States again. As a biography, the Stilwell book is very good—it had news. Tuchman constructed a portrait of Stilwell gleaned from diaries and letters that had never been released. And the book was prescient. Tuchman laid out the mistakes that plagued America’s foray into China, from the hundreds of millions of dollars used to shore up its crumbling economy, to the senseless killing during the Rape of Nanking, to the Pentagon’s assurances to the American people that Chiang Kai-shek was a hero for the cause of freedom and democracy. But I only realized later that she was actually hinting at the debacle in Vietnam. The Stilwell book was published in early 1971, some six months before The New York Times released the Pentagon Papers revealing that the Johnson administration had systematically not told the truth, not only to the public but also to Congress, that the U.S. had played an active role in the 1963 overthrow and assassination of President Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam, and that the bombing campaign in North Vietnam was not going nearly as well as advertised. Once that happened it changed how people viewed Tuchman’s book. It made them wonder how we could have learned so little from our history.
[sidebar head="Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911-1945" Deck="By Barbara W. Tuchman
Macmillan, 1971" style="full"]
Excerpt
In July 1944, at the height of the Second World War, the United States Government officially requested Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to place an American, specifically Lieutenant General Joseph W. Stilwell, in command of all China’s armed forces. The proposal was unprecedented: no American had ever before directly commanded the national forces of an ally. It was the more extreme because General Stilwell, already a figure of accomplishment, controversy and feuds in the China-Burma-India theater, was known to be persona non grata to the Generalissimo who had previously asked for his recall.
China’s case, however, was considered “desperate,” demanding “desperate remedies.” To keep China in the war, salvage something of her combat potential and prevent the consolidation of Japan’s hold on the mainland were objects essential to both American strategy and postwar policy. “The future of all Asia is at stake,” President Roosevelt said in his message to Chiang Kai-shek, “along with the tremendous effort which America has expended in that region. He was fully aware, he added, “of your feelings regarding General Stilwell” but “I know of no other man who has the ability, the force and the determination to offset the disaster that now threatens China.
Reprinted by the permission of Russell & Volkening as agents for the author. Copyright © 1970, 1971 by Barbara Tuchman. [/sidebar]